Tvinga inte barn att välja förälder! (via INGRID CARLQVIST)
fredag, 18 juni 2010, 15:15 av maukonen
Om du har missat det så vill jag pusha lite för Ingrids senaste kloka ord!
Hon skriver bla. om Vid som tvingas att fatta ett av de grymmaste besluten som man kan tvinga på ett barn.
Att tvingas att välja bort en av sina föräldrar.
Det är den ena föräldern som så smidigt lämpar över detta tunga och grymma beslut på sitt barn.
Vid Frank Radosh är en 13-årig kille som tvingats fatta det grymmaste beslut ett barn kan ställas inför: Att välja bort en av sina föräldrar. En gång var Vid en riktig liten mammagris, han var som ett ”plåster på mamma Anna” som hon själv uttrycker det. Sedan hans pappa Nino kidnappade honom till Bosnien för drygt två år sedan har hans kontakt med mamma varit i stort sett helt avbruten. Härförleden fick de dock träffas en kort stund på socialkont … Read More
via INGRID CARLQVIST
Publicerat i Allmänt, Barn, Brott, Familj, Samhällsproblem, Sanning & Lögner | Taggad Allmänt, Brott, Familj, Föräldrarskap, Gömda, Grov egenmäktighet med barn, Info, Ingrid Carlqvist, Läs!, Nyheter, Saknade Barn, Vid Frank Radosh | 9 kommentarer
Ann-Mari's Blogg 
Ingrid,Ingrid ,do you really understand what are you writing,you dont have any information and you can ask yourself why this man get custody from swedish court.
Which father are you refering to pappa?
Ingrid writes of Vid´s father Nino and of Frank & Andre´s father.
So which one are you asking Ingrid about?
In my understanding Ingrid NEVER writes anything without good and truthful information regarding the subject of her articles. So I´m curious to what you´re insinuating in your few word of a comment.
Pappa, what do you mean? The father only had custody for a brief period when he had kept Vid a prisoner in the house, not letting him go to school. The court thought they did something to cool the situation, but before the real court order came Nino kidnapped Vid to Bosnia. Since then Anna has had sole custody of Vid, both in Sweden and in Bosnia. I really hope Nino lets Vid go back to his home now. What he is doing to his son is criminal and evil and will destroy the boy’s life.
Ingrid,somebody is giving you a falsk information,Vid has been with his father from 2007.10.30 antill 2008.05.19 and then they left sweden.Vid has been in westberga polisen becouse mamma och her boyfrend has been violent with the boy.If you reed what the court in Stockholm decided on 2008.02.11 you would understand that mamma change a school becouse a boy run away from her more than 20 times.It was a secret for father in which school Vid was writen .There is a lot more.Be carefull when you are writing a falsk information which somebody give to you . With kind regards ,pappa.
Kind of strange that the court has given the custodial rights of Vid to the mother then.
Both in Sweden and in Bosnia!!!!
If it´s truth what you´re writing….
Zelimir Radosh a.k.a Pappa, please stop with the false accusations and think about what you are doing. The reason Anna changed school was because your presence at Vids previous school was a trauma for him. You were there to tell him to run home to you in a bid to sway the courts, even then you were manipulating Vid. Anna was able to change school because 1 she was the legal guardian and 2 your visatation rights were taken from you because of your previous behaviour.
And just because you try to accuse us of violence does not make it true, we both know who has been violent towards Vid.
The only reason Vid was with you during that period is because you kept him prisoner and did not allow him to go to school, for which you were arrested. Directly after this Anna changed schools, but you went to the new school and took Vid again.
The only reason you got temporary custody is because the court wanted to avoid the trauma of the police arresting you again and retrieving Vid, because there was short a short time to the final court hearing.
The decision of the court awarded custody to Anna, and they saw that you were so dangerous for Vid that you should only meet him in the presence of someone from the social services, with no time restrictions attached to this point.
Now that same decision is law in Bosnia. Are you really prepared to put Vid through the trauma of the police arresting you and them delivering Vid to his mother and legal guardian, do you care so little for him that you put yourself and your fantasies before the wellbeing of your son ?
Have you no comprehension of the fact that you have to follow the law and that you now have no choice but to follow the courts decision ?
You can cast as many accusations as you want but it will never change the fact that the courts have reached their decision and you are bound by this.
Now you have to be a parent and not put Vid through more trauma, by ignoring the courts ruling you will be responsible for the consequences of this action and the only person that will suffer is Vid.
This man and Anna Frank is giving you a falsk information and Kevin and Anna are behind organization Saknade barn which are manipulating with people and giving them a falsk informations about courts decisions,nobody understand what is meaning with writing something what newer heppens and will newer heppen.Apsurd,there is reality,and nobody can ignore that.
Dear reality,
It would be nice to hear the TRUTH from Vid and only Vid´s voice not his father´s lies through Vid.
The courts has seen the truth and the lies and all evidence that proves whom is the right custodial parent of Vid.
It is quite clear Vid is under some really bad and twisted influence of his father – whom kidnapped him has hidden him away from his mother, family and friends.
So, reality.
Are you one of Nino´s lackeys with no opinion of your own ?
So Zelimir Rados, tell us the truth then, what is it exactly that is not true ?
Which court decision is false ?
What is it that has never happend ?
Do you deny that you have abducted Vid ?
Do you deny that you refuse all communication and access between Anna and Vid ?
Is it untrue that Anna is the legal guardian ?
Is it untrue that you are wanted for your crime via Interpol ?
Is it untrue that the court decision from Sweden, giving Anna full custody is now accepted in Bosnia, and I quote, ” the decsision is to be seen as if it had been made in a court in Bosnia”